<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Christmas Quiz II - An Answer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/christmas-quiz-ii-an-answer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/christmas-quiz-ii-an-answer/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Web and Web 2.0</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil Wilson</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/christmas-quiz-ii-an-answer/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 16:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/christmas-quiz-ii-an-answer/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>IIRC, the w3c has trademarked XHTML so it can't be used by anyone else, although I could be wrong, so that would presumably stop the WHAT-WG's usage.

You'll notice of course, that having read Patrick's link, the suggested chair of the WHAT-WG is Chris Wilson, who is effectively the manager of IE7.

So that puts Opera, Mozilla and probably Microsoft for HTML5; to me XHTML 2 is just so much pipe-dream. Or  maybe it will be used, but not by browsers, or without some conversion to real HTML on the way? It's an interesting future, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IIRC, the w3c has trademarked XHTML so it can&#8217;t be used by anyone else, although I could be wrong, so that would presumably stop the WHAT-WG&#8217;s usage.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll notice of course, that having read Patrick&#8217;s link, the suggested chair of the WHAT-WG is Chris Wilson, who is effectively the manager of IE7.</p>
<p>So that puts Opera, Mozilla and probably Microsoft for HTML5; to me XHTML 2 is just so much pipe-dream. Or  maybe it will be used, but not by browsers, or without some conversion to real HTML on the way? It&#8217;s an interesting future, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick h. lauke</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/christmas-quiz-ii-an-answer/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick h. lauke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 23:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2006/12/20/christmas-quiz-ii-an-answer/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>and sort of on topic, i found this tidbit i just spotted interesting http://glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/index.php?2006/12/21/2363-future-of-the-html-wg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and sort of on topic, i found this tidbit i just spotted interesting <a href="http://glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/index.php?2006/12/21/2363-future-of-the-html-wg" rel="nofollow">http://glazman.org/weblog/dotclear/index.php?2006/12/21/2363-future-of-the-html-wg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
