<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ASBOs, Linked Data and Open Data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/asbos-linked-data-and-open-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/asbos-linked-data-and-open-data/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Web and Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 20:04:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: HotStuff 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Word of the Day: &#8220;complexities&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/asbos-linked-data-and-open-data/#comment-76886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HotStuff 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Word of the Day: &#8220;complexities&#8221;]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 04:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=4177#comment-76886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Linked Data and Open Data [web link]UK Web Focus (31/Mar/2010)&#8220;&#8230;with all the associated complexities perhaps the next [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Linked Data and Open Data [web link]UK Web Focus (31/Mar/2010)&#8220;&#8230;with all the associated complexities perhaps the next [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/asbos-linked-data-and-open-data/#comment-76869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=4177#comment-76869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;should the push be for open data&quot;?

yes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;should the push be for open data&#8221;?</p>
<p>yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cultural Heritage &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Elsewhere on UKOLN Blogs: March 2010</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/asbos-linked-data-and-open-data/#comment-76863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cultural Heritage &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Elsewhere on UKOLN Blogs: March 2010]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 08:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=4177#comment-76863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ASBOs, Linked Data and Open Data [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ASBOs, Linked Data and Open Data [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Wallace</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/asbos-linked-data-and-open-data/#comment-76860</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Wallace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=4177#comment-76860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t agree with Kingsley on the prospect of simply turning CSV into RDF. Of course you can do it mechanically, just as we routinely convert CSV to say XML. But data in the format of RDF triples is no more linked data than XML is if the vocabulary and the URIs are purely local.  Data only becomes linked when URIs denoting resources, predicates and types are shared between data sets.  This is hard work because it involves a deep understanding of the semantics of both local terms and resources and the target terms and resources, and as we have seen, that can be just plain hard work. We know all this from the difficult of integrating databases even within a company. I find it strange that some think its going to be easy to integrate dataset across the world.

Tools like David Huynh&#039;s Freebase Gridworks http://blog.freebase.com/2010/03/26/preview-freebase-gridworks/ are powerful data editors but even they do not really tackle the task of semantic alignment. The editor tool is human-guided (which raised questions about the repeatability of the mapping when the underlying dataset has to be re-imported) and currently only maps to one dataset, Freebase. 

Chris]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t agree with Kingsley on the prospect of simply turning CSV into RDF. Of course you can do it mechanically, just as we routinely convert CSV to say XML. But data in the format of RDF triples is no more linked data than XML is if the vocabulary and the URIs are purely local.  Data only becomes linked when URIs denoting resources, predicates and types are shared between data sets.  This is hard work because it involves a deep understanding of the semantics of both local terms and resources and the target terms and resources, and as we have seen, that can be just plain hard work. We know all this from the difficult of integrating databases even within a company. I find it strange that some think its going to be easy to integrate dataset across the world.</p>
<p>Tools like David Huynh&#8217;s Freebase Gridworks <a href="http://blog.freebase.com/2010/03/26/preview-freebase-gridworks/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.freebase.com/2010/03/26/preview-freebase-gridworks/</a> are powerful data editors but even they do not really tackle the task of semantic alignment. The editor tool is human-guided (which raised questions about the repeatability of the mapping when the underlying dataset has to be re-imported) and currently only maps to one dataset, Freebase. </p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Rusbridge</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/asbos-linked-data-and-open-data/#comment-76859</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Rusbridge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=4177#comment-76859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you seen Bill Roberts post on a proposed tool to convert other forms of data to RDF? See http://www.webofdatablog.com/articles/got-data-want-linked-data?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen Bill Roberts post on a proposed tool to convert other forms of data to RDF? See <a href="http://www.webofdatablog.com/articles/got-data-want-linked-data" rel="nofollow">http://www.webofdatablog.com/articles/got-data-want-linked-data</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/asbos-linked-data-and-open-data/#comment-76857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[uberVU - social comments]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=4177#comment-76857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by readyState: Don&#039;t confuse linked data with open data: http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/asbos-linked-data-and-open-data/ #rdf #opendata...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by readyState: Don&#8217;t confuse linked data with open data: <a href="http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/asbos-linked-data-and-open-data/" rel="nofollow">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/03/31/asbos-linked-data-and-open-data/</a> #rdf #opendata&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
