<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on Additional Costs of WordPress.com Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/thoughts-on-additional-costs-of-wordpress-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/thoughts-on-additional-costs-of-wordpress-blogs/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Web and Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: miquelduran</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/thoughts-on-additional-costs-of-wordpress-blogs/#comment-86747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[miquelduran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 22:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=6265#comment-86747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are concerned about the image of our blogs. We are starting a blog on chemistry (teh International Year of Chemistry is 2011) on Saturday, so we set up a blog in wordpress, purchased a suitable internet domain name, and for just a few euros the outside view is unrelated to wordpress.com. 
Good job. Enough for our purposes (catquimica.cat, Chemistry in Catalan)
Timely post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are concerned about the image of our blogs. We are starting a blog on chemistry (teh International Year of Chemistry is 2011) on Saturday, so we set up a blog in wordpress, purchased a suitable internet domain name, and for just a few euros the outside view is unrelated to wordpress.com.<br />
Good job. Enough for our purposes (catquimica.cat, Chemistry in Catalan)<br />
Timely post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Weekly Roundup &#124; The Digital Immigrant</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/thoughts-on-additional-costs-of-wordpress-blogs/#comment-85204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Weekly Roundup &#124; The Digital Immigrant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=6265#comment-85204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] my opinion, the benefits that come with a free WordPress.com blog far outweigh the few constraints. IMO self-hosting is just not worth the hassle, nor, for that matter, is burdening an already [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my opinion, the benefits that come with a free WordPress.com blog far outweigh the few constraints. IMO self-hosting is just not worth the hassle, nor, for that matter, is burdening an already [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: telfleur</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/thoughts-on-additional-costs-of-wordpress-blogs/#comment-84941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[telfleur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=6265#comment-84941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Brian, long time no see :-) 

I have been using wordpress.com for some time now, and I am very pleased with the services. 

Sean, of course the choice of the platform depends of what you wish to offer visitors of a site. Having said that, and assuming your budget is low, I think wordpress.com makes a good candidate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brian, long time no see :-) </p>
<p>I have been using wordpress.com for some time now, and I am very pleased with the services. </p>
<p>Sean, of course the choice of the platform depends of what you wish to offer visitors of a site. Having said that, and assuming your budget is low, I think wordpress.com makes a good candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Mulcahy</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/thoughts-on-additional-costs-of-wordpress-blogs/#comment-84927</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Mulcahy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=6265#comment-84927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am looking to help an Junior School to create a web presence, and I am seriously looking at Wordpress as a viable solution. Looking at other school&#039;s (paid for) websites there seems to be little functionality above what is available for free from Wordpress.

I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking to help an Junior School to create a web presence, and I am seriously looking at WordPress as a viable solution. Looking at other school&#8217;s (paid for) websites there seems to be little functionality above what is available for free from WordPress.</p>
<p>I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Nolan</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/thoughts-on-additional-costs-of-wordpress-blogs/#comment-84923</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Nolan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=6265#comment-84923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If even 10% of your thousand institutional blogs require the ad-free add on or VideoPress or custom CSS or their own domain name then very quickly the costs mount up.  I think you overestimate how much effort is involved in running a multi site WordPress service.  Sure, you can shift the costs to departments by directing them to WordPress but they&#039;ll still be there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If even 10% of your thousand institutional blogs require the ad-free add on or VideoPress or custom CSS or their own domain name then very quickly the costs mount up.  I think you overestimate how much effort is involved in running a multi site WordPress service.  Sure, you can shift the costs to departments by directing them to WordPress but they&#8217;ll still be there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Thoughts on Additional Costs of WordPress.com Blogs « UK Web Focus -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/thoughts-on-additional-costs-of-wordpress-blogs/#comment-84922</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tweets that mention Thoughts on Additional Costs of WordPress.com Blogs « UK Web Focus -- Topsy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=6265#comment-84922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brian Kelly, Brian Kelly. Brian Kelly said: Thoughts on Additional Costs of WordPress.com Blogs: In a paper on ”Moving From Personal to Organisational Use o... http://bit.ly/f5eUv5 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brian Kelly, Brian Kelly. Brian Kelly said: Thoughts on Additional Costs of WordPress.com Blogs: In a paper on ”Moving From Personal to Organisational Use o&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/f5eUv5" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/f5eUv5</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
