<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Do We Measure the Effectiveness of Institutional Repositories?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/how-do-we-measure-the-effectiveness-of-institutional-repositories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/how-do-we-measure-the-effectiveness-of-institutional-repositories/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Web and Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 07:42:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Pilot Survey of the Numbers of Full-Text Items in Institutional Repositories &#171; UK Web Focus</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/how-do-we-measure-the-effectiveness-of-institutional-repositories/#comment-91759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Pilot Survey of the Numbers of Full-Text Items in Institutional Repositories &#171; UK Web Focus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 07:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=6869#comment-91759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] recent post on How Do We Measure the Effectiveness of Institutional Repositories? sought to address the question of &#8220;What makes a good repository?&#8221; which was raised on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recent post on How Do We Measure the Effectiveness of Institutional Repositories? sought to address the question of &#8220;What makes a good repository?&#8221; which was raised on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Efficacité des archives ouvertes, évaluation statistique, projet PIRUS &#124; docnews</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/how-do-we-measure-the-effectiveness-of-institutional-repositories/#comment-91099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Efficacité des archives ouvertes, évaluation statistique, projet PIRUS &#124; docnews]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=6869#comment-91099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] How Do We Measure the Effectiveness of Institutional Repositories? « UK Web Focus. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Do We Measure the Effectiveness of Institutional Repositories? « UK Web Focus. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Rusbridge</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/how-do-we-measure-the-effectiveness-of-institutional-repositories/#comment-90868</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Rusbridge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=6869#comment-90868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@brian, the Van Goch Ariadne article supports a general comment that I&#039;ve heard expressed as &quot;we need to look at web data, not web stats&quot; (I guess this means the detailed individual data, showing referrals etc, rather than just totals). My feeling is there is much more to be gained from the data here.

@graham, how does that play in terms of PIRUS2? Will that help us with data, or stats?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@brian, the Van Goch Ariadne article supports a general comment that I&#8217;ve heard expressed as &#8220;we need to look at web data, not web stats&#8221; (I guess this means the detailed individual data, showing referrals etc, rather than just totals). My feeling is there is much more to be gained from the data here.</p>
<p>@graham, how does that play in terms of PIRUS2? Will that help us with data, or stats?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Stone</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/how-do-we-measure-the-effectiveness-of-institutional-repositories/#comment-90865</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Graham Stone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 10:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=6869#comment-90865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian, I&#039;m hopeful that the forthcoming PIRUS2 final report will take us a step further to reliable COUNTER reports for IRs.

More info at http://www.cranfieldlibrary.cranfield.ac.uk/pirus2/tiki-index.php]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, I&#8217;m hopeful that the forthcoming PIRUS2 final report will take us a step further to reliable COUNTER reports for IRs.</p>
<p>More info at <a href="http://www.cranfieldlibrary.cranfield.ac.uk/pirus2/tiki-index.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.cranfieldlibrary.cranfield.ac.uk/pirus2/tiki-index.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dépôts institutionnels / -métries &#171; pintiniblog</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/how-do-we-measure-the-effectiveness-of-institutional-repositories/#comment-90824</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dépôts institutionnels / -métries &#171; pintiniblog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2011 06:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=6869#comment-90824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] How Do We Measure the Effectiveness of Institutional Repositories? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] How Do We Measure the Effectiveness of Institutional Repositories? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Kelly (UK Web Focus)</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/how-do-we-measure-the-effectiveness-of-institutional-repositories/#comment-90817</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Kelly (UK Web Focus)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=6869#comment-90817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that there is a need for a better understanding of the data which is presented by the IRStats package.  Looking at the IRStats documentation there is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.eprints.org/w/IRStats&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IR Stats page on the EPrints wiki&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.eprints.org/w/IRStats_Technical_Documentation&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IR Stats Technical Documentation&lt;/a&gt;.

From the former resource it seems that &quot;&lt;em&gt;AWStats data is used to filter out webspiders and classify search engines&lt;/em&gt;&quot;. This goes on to add that &quot;&lt;em&gt;This is a separate log analysing program and can be obtained from &lt;a href=&quot;http://awstats.sourceforge.net&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://awstats.sourceforge.net/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&quot;. However I was unable to find out exactly what this means.  I will see if I can find a reference for what exactly this figure means.


Further information is provided]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that there is a need for a better understanding of the data which is presented by the IRStats package.  Looking at the IRStats documentation there is the <a href="http://wiki.eprints.org/w/IRStats" rel="nofollow">IR Stats page on the EPrints wiki</a> and the <a href="http://wiki.eprints.org/w/IRStats_Technical_Documentation" rel="nofollow">IR Stats Technical Documentation</a>.</p>
<p>From the former resource it seems that &#8220;<em>AWStats data is used to filter out webspiders and classify search engines</em>&#8220;. This goes on to add that &#8220;<em>This is a separate log analysing program and can be obtained from <a href="http://awstats.sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow">http://awstats.sourceforge.net/</a></em>&#8220;. However I was unable to find out exactly what this means.  I will see if I can find a reference for what exactly this figure means.</p>
<p>Further information is provided</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Hitchcock</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/how-do-we-measure-the-effectiveness-of-institutional-repositories/#comment-90816</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Hitchcock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=6869#comment-90816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brian, For your figure that 38% of traffic to the University of Bath repository comes from Google to be valid and useful you would need to be able to explain the almost 50% of traffic labelled at &#039;Non-applicable&#039; according to your generated chart. Have you looked at the reasons for that result?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, For your figure that 38% of traffic to the University of Bath repository comes from Google to be valid and useful you would need to be able to explain the almost 50% of traffic labelled at &#8216;Non-applicable&#8217; according to your generated chart. Have you looked at the reasons for that result?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention How Do We Measure the Effectiveness of Institutional Repositories? « UK Web Focus -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/how-do-we-measure-the-effectiveness-of-institutional-repositories/#comment-90799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tweets that mention How Do We Measure the Effectiveness of Institutional Repositories? « UK Web Focus -- Topsy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=6869#comment-90799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brian Kelly, Gaz Johnson, M Sarah Wickham, Chemistry Central, Javier Gomez and others. Javier Gomez said: How Do We Measure the Effectiveness of Institutional Repositories? http://bit.ly/ewcOnZ #oa #openaccess #repositories via @llordllama [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brian Kelly, Gaz Johnson, M Sarah Wickham, Chemistry Central, Javier Gomez and others. Javier Gomez said: How Do We Measure the Effectiveness of Institutional Repositories? <a href="http://bit.ly/ewcOnZ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/ewcOnZ</a> #oa #openaccess #repositories via @llordllama [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: llordllama</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/02/24/how-do-we-measure-the-effectiveness-of-institutional-repositories/#comment-90798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[llordllama]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=6869#comment-90798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A very interesting post Brian.  I&#039;m just in the process of putting together Leicester annual stats report on 2010 (I do monthlies as well).  One difficulty for mem certainly in terms of getting higher up to take what I&#039;m saying &quot;seriously&quot; is the lack of benchmarking in the field.  Last year&#039;s SCONUL stats questions didn&#039;t help much as they weren&#039;t (IMHO) asking the right questions, but at least they were a start.

I tend to find though higher ups here are pretty much solely focussed on record numbers (not full-text) and record accesses (again to anything).  I try and steer them towards the importance of the full text usage as best i can though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very interesting post Brian.  I&#8217;m just in the process of putting together Leicester annual stats report on 2010 (I do monthlies as well).  One difficulty for mem certainly in terms of getting higher up to take what I&#8217;m saying &#8220;seriously&#8221; is the lack of benchmarking in the field.  Last year&#8217;s SCONUL stats questions didn&#8217;t help much as they weren&#8217;t (IMHO) asking the right questions, but at least they were a start.</p>
<p>I tend to find though higher ups here are pretty much solely focussed on record numbers (not full-text) and record accesses (again to anything).  I try and steer them towards the importance of the full text usage as best i can though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
