<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Institutional Strategies for the Mobile Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/institutional-strategies-for-the-mobile-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/institutional-strategies-for-the-mobile-web/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Web and Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:13:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do We Want Technical Diversity or Harmonisation? &#171; UK Web Focus</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/institutional-strategies-for-the-mobile-web/#comment-92504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Do We Want Technical Diversity or Harmonisation? &#171; UK Web Focus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=7609#comment-92504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] will be used to deliver mobile web services.  UKOLN and CETIS recently carried out a survey on Institutional Use of the Mobile Web. Although we are still working on our report on the survey the  findings for the initial question [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will be used to deliver mobile web services.  UKOLN and CETIS recently carried out a survey on Institutional Use of the Mobile Web. Although we are still working on our report on the survey the  findings for the initial question [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: App Ecosystem &#171; Geo-Mobile Blog</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/institutional-strategies-for-the-mobile-web/#comment-92220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[App Ecosystem &#171; Geo-Mobile Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 09:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=7609#comment-92220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I made the comment that the whole mobile web vs. native debate was fascinating and current and that mobile web was losing. But everyone seemed to agree that apps are a pretty bad deal for developers and that making any [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I made the comment that the whole mobile web vs. native debate was fascinating and current and that mobile web was losing. But everyone seemed to agree that apps are a pretty bad deal for developers and that making any [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goin&#8217; Mobile &#124; IWMW 2011 blog</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/institutional-strategies-for-the-mobile-web/#comment-91984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goin&#8217; Mobile &#124; IWMW 2011 blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=7609#comment-91984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Kelly has written a recent blog post on Institutional Strategies for the Mobile Web which highlights a survey on Institutional Use of the Mobile Web being carried out by UKOLN and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kelly has written a recent blog post on Institutional Strategies for the Mobile Web which highlights a survey on Institutional Use of the Mobile Web being carried out by UKOLN and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Hawksey</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/institutional-strategies-for-the-mobile-web/#comment-91976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Hawksey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=7609#comment-91976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Stubbs posted some interesting data recently on the JISC W2W blog on &#039;Responses from 100 device-led student interviews&#039; http://lrt.mmu.ac.uk/w2c/2011/06/11/responses-from-100-device-led-student-interviews/. Its a small survey and the respondent demographic isn&#039;t clear but it&#039;s interesting that email is still a dominant mobile use (3rd behind texts and calls). Mark also posted last year on the growth in Blackberry http://lrt.mmu.ac.uk/w2c/2010/12/07/growth-of-blackberry/ devices used by teens and I wonder if Blackberry&#039;s and in particular Blackberry Messenger is having an influence here (the Guardian article you link to also references that &quot;teenagers have become hooked on its BlackBerry Messenger application, which lets them chat online without using up text or voice time because it runs on RIM&#039;s servers&quot;.  

One final piece I would like to chuck in the mix comes from the EventGenie blog which highlights that &#039;Smartphone use isn’t necessarily app use&#039; http://www.eventgenie.com/smartphone-use-isn%e2%80%99t-necessarily-app-use/ in which they say:

&quot;BlackBerry retains a major slice of smartphone ownership (27% in the US- against 28% iPhone and 27% Android), and thanks to BlackBerry Messenger, have a good footprint with the young, supposedly app-savvy demographics. Apps will work on a good proportion of them (at least ours do), but many Blackberry owners don’t know, or care, that their device can run them.&quot;

So if I was taking strategic decisions about mobile app development I&#039;d be looking at web apps, because it&#039;s unlikely I would be able to afford to develop for 3 different platforms 

Martin]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Stubbs posted some interesting data recently on the JISC W2W blog on &#8216;Responses from 100 device-led student interviews&#8217; <a href="http://lrt.mmu.ac.uk/w2c/2011/06/11/responses-from-100-device-led-student-interviews/" rel="nofollow">http://lrt.mmu.ac.uk/w2c/2011/06/11/responses-from-100-device-led-student-interviews/</a>. Its a small survey and the respondent demographic isn&#8217;t clear but it&#8217;s interesting that email is still a dominant mobile use (3rd behind texts and calls). Mark also posted last year on the growth in Blackberry <a href="http://lrt.mmu.ac.uk/w2c/2010/12/07/growth-of-blackberry/" rel="nofollow">http://lrt.mmu.ac.uk/w2c/2010/12/07/growth-of-blackberry/</a> devices used by teens and I wonder if Blackberry&#8217;s and in particular Blackberry Messenger is having an influence here (the Guardian article you link to also references that &#8220;teenagers have become hooked on its BlackBerry Messenger application, which lets them chat online without using up text or voice time because it runs on RIM&#8217;s servers&#8221;.  </p>
<p>One final piece I would like to chuck in the mix comes from the EventGenie blog which highlights that &#8216;Smartphone use isn’t necessarily app use&#8217; <a href="http://www.eventgenie.com/smartphone-use-isn%e2%80%99t-necessarily-app-use/" rel="nofollow">http://www.eventgenie.com/smartphone-use-isn%e2%80%99t-necessarily-app-use/</a> in which they say:</p>
<p>&#8220;BlackBerry retains a major slice of smartphone ownership (27% in the US- against 28% iPhone and 27% Android), and thanks to BlackBerry Messenger, have a good footprint with the young, supposedly app-savvy demographics. Apps will work on a good proportion of them (at least ours do), but many Blackberry owners don’t know, or care, that their device can run them.&#8221;</p>
<p>So if I was taking strategic decisions about mobile app development I&#8217;d be looking at web apps, because it&#8217;s unlikely I would be able to afford to develop for 3 different platforms </p>
<p>Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
