<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Can&#8217;t Ignore Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/09/23/we-cant-ignore-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/09/23/we-cant-ignore-facebook/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Web and Web 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:25:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Media? It&#8217;s About The Numbers! &#171; UK Web Focus</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/09/23/we-cant-ignore-facebook/#comment-120693</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Social Media? It&#8217;s About The Numbers! &#171; UK Web Focus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=8202#comment-120693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] extends beyond global events such as the Olympic Games. Last year in a post which argued that We Can’t Ignore Facebook I described use of Facebook and Twitter to promote the Bath Folk Festival.  Facebook, it turned [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] extends beyond global events such as the Olympic Games. Last year in a post which argued that We Can’t Ignore Facebook I described use of Facebook and Twitter to promote the Bath Folk Festival.  Facebook, it turned [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Higher Education Welcome Frictionless Sharing? &#171; UK Web Focus</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/09/23/we-cant-ignore-facebook/#comment-107759</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Should Higher Education Welcome Frictionless Sharing? &#171; UK Web Focus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=8202#comment-107759</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] how popular is the Guardian Facebook app? A post which suggested that We Can’t Ignore Facebook described how the Guardian Facebook app was launched on 22 September 2011. Statistics for a number [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] how popular is the Guardian Facebook app? A post which suggested that We Can’t Ignore Facebook described how the Guardian Facebook app was launched on 22 September 2011. Statistics for a number [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metrics, This Time For Web Accessibility &#171; UK Web Focus</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/09/23/we-cant-ignore-facebook/#comment-93838</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Metrics, This Time For Web Accessibility &#171; UK Web Focus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=8202#comment-93838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] We Can&#8217;t Ignore&#160;Facebook [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We Can&#8217;t Ignore&nbsp;Facebook [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hazel Edmunds</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/09/23/we-cant-ignore-facebook/#comment-93285</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hazel Edmunds]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=8202#comment-93285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t play down your interest in &quot;folk&quot; a)  because many of your serious followers are also into folk in its many guises and b) many innovations come from leisure interests (setting up event pages for a folk festival, sharing information on a local knitting group etc).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t play down your interest in &#8220;folk&#8221; a)  because many of your serious followers are also into folk in its many guises and b) many innovations come from leisure interests (setting up event pages for a folk festival, sharing information on a local knitting group etc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Kelly</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/09/23/we-cant-ignore-facebook/#comment-93261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Kelly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 12:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=8202#comment-93261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your comment.  You are correct - Facebook&#039;s use of RDFa in the Open Graph Protocol isn&#039;t new - the news item referred to developments which were mentioned in yesterday&#039;s conference.  Sorry that my post was ambiguous.

You&#039;re right that we should continue to monitor the implications of Facebook developments. As well as the privacy implications which, for example, I highlighted in the context of the Guardian app, there&#039;s also a need to monitor associated user behaviours.  Looking at the stats for the Guardian app in the short period of time since the app was announced it seems that as of today at 13.15 there have been 115,794 likes of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/theguardian&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;main section&lt;/a&gt;, 6,895 of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/mediaguardian&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Guardian Media&lt;/a&gt;, 5,294 of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/guardianfootball&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Guardian Football&lt;/a&gt;, 4,025 for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/guardianculture&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Guardian Culture&lt;/a&gt;, 3,776 for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/musicguardian&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Guardian Music&lt;/a&gt;, 3,678 of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/guardiantechnology&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Guardian Technology&lt;/a&gt;, 3,174 of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/guardianscience&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Guardian Science, 2,039 of &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/guardiandata&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Guardian Data&lt;/a&gt; and 1,965 of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/societyguardian&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Guardian Society&lt;/a&gt;. Will these numbers drop as people become aware of the implications - or grow, perhaps indicating that privacy issues aren&#039;t felt to to outweigh the benefits?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment.  You are correct &#8211; Facebook&#8217;s use of RDFa in the Open Graph Protocol isn&#8217;t new &#8211; the news item referred to developments which were mentioned in yesterday&#8217;s conference.  Sorry that my post was ambiguous.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right that we should continue to monitor the implications of Facebook developments. As well as the privacy implications which, for example, I highlighted in the context of the Guardian app, there&#8217;s also a need to monitor associated user behaviours.  Looking at the stats for the Guardian app in the short period of time since the app was announced it seems that as of today at 13.15 there have been 115,794 likes of the <a href="http://www.facebook.com/theguardian" rel="nofollow">main section</a>, 6,895 of the <a href="http://www.facebook.com/mediaguardian" rel="nofollow">Guardian Media</a>, 5,294 of <a href="http://www.facebook.com/guardianfootball" rel="nofollow">Guardian Football</a>, 4,025 for the <a href="http://www.facebook.com/guardianculture" rel="nofollow">Guardian Culture</a>, 3,776 for <a href="http://www.facebook.com/musicguardian" rel="nofollow">Guardian Music</a>, 3,678 of <a href="http://www.facebook.com/guardiantechnology" rel="nofollow">Guardian Technology</a>, 3,174 of <a href="http://www.facebook.com/guardianscience" rel="nofollow">Guardian Science, 2,039 of </a><a href="http://www.facebook.com/guardiandata" rel="nofollow">Guardian Data</a> and 1,965 of <a href="http://www.facebook.com/societyguardian" rel="nofollow">Guardian Society</a>. Will these numbers drop as people become aware of the implications &#8211; or grow, perhaps indicating that privacy issues aren&#8217;t felt to to outweigh the benefits?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeteJ</title>
		<link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2011/09/23/we-cant-ignore-facebook/#comment-93258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PeteJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 10:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/?p=8202#comment-93258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think Facebook OGP use of RDFa is a new thing? e.g. &quot;We&#039;ve based the initial version of the protocol on RDFa&quot; 
 http://ogp.me/ &quot;Last updated December 10th, 2010.&quot; I think maybe they&#039;ve just updated to RDFa 1.1? I could be wrong though.

On the broader point of &quot;we can&#039;t ignore Facebook&quot;: oh, I agree, I follow with interest and concern their ongoing attempts to erode privacy, shape the information we see, and to extract ever more information from individuals in order to support their customer base of advertisers. 

I&#039;m always mightily relieved I don&#039;t have an Fb account though! :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Facebook OGP use of RDFa is a new thing? e.g. &#8220;We&#8217;ve based the initial version of the protocol on RDFa&#8221;<br />
 <a href="http://ogp.me/" rel="nofollow">http://ogp.me/</a> &#8220;Last updated December 10th, 2010.&#8221; I think maybe they&#8217;ve just updated to RDFa 1.1? I could be wrong though.</p>
<p>On the broader point of &#8220;we can&#8217;t ignore Facebook&#8221;: oh, I agree, I follow with interest and concern their ongoing attempts to erode privacy, shape the information we see, and to extract ever more information from individuals in order to support their customer base of advertisers. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m always mightily relieved I don&#8217;t have an Fb account though! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
