UK Web Focus (Brian Kelly)

Innovation and best practices for the Web

Archive for Nov 17th, 2006

Risk Assessment For Use Of Third Party Web 2.0 Services

Posted by Brian Kelly on 17 Nov 2006

This posting contains the content of the “Risk Assessment For Use Of Third Party Web 2.0 Services” QA Focus briefing document. It has been posted here in order to explore the use of a Blog to receive feedback on a document, as described in my previous posting on “Blogs – Suitable For Reports“.

The briefing document was the initial attempt at providing advice for organisations considering making use of third party Web sites. I’d like to build on this initial work, so comments on the advice, suggestions on other approaches and details of any experiences people have had working in this area would be welcome. Read the rest of this entry »

Advertisements

Posted in IWMC, Web2.0 | 1 Comment »

Blogs – suitable for reports?

Posted by Brian Kelly on 17 Nov 2006

A recent Technorati search for JISC (which, incidentally, included a sponsored link suggesting that I search for JISC on eBay!) led me to a JISC-funded report on “the use of learning technologies in delivering art and design courses to HE students within an FE environment“.

The study was available using Blogging software, rather, than as one might normally expect, in PDF and possible static HTML. This approach was clearly described as an experiment:

The study is delivered as an interactive website based around a wordpress blog, the blog allows and encourages feedback and comments – at the end of each section feel free to leave any comments you may have, however there is a system of moderation of all comments that means they may not show up immediately.

Seeing this has made me reflect on the possible benefits (and possible weaknesses) of using Blogging software in this way – and also on other ways in which Blogs can be used.

Obvious benefits include:

  • The WordPress software provides comments as a standard.
  • The software provides ‘permalinks’ for the individual sections.
  • RSS feeds are provided as standard.

Possible limitations include:

  • Difficulties in obtaining a simple printout of the entire report
  • Printouts may not be designed for reading (i.e. Blog navigational features may be included).
  • The software may not support HTML and CSS standards (although this does not seem to be a significant problem in this case).
  • The URI structure may be imposed by the software and it may not be possible to manage preferred best practices.
  • The URI structure may impose a flat structure, which makes it difficult to exploit traditional hierarchical structures (e.g. select a directory for use by an off-line browser).
  • Users may chose not to make use of the annotation features, calling the use of this approach into question.

In this particular case, the experimental approach has been clearly identified, and I hope the project gains useful feedback.

In the meantime I’ll try and give some thoughts to ways in which Blogs may be used other than providing a personal set of opinions and thoughts, organised in a diary fashion.

Posted in Blog | 4 Comments »