UK Web Focus (Brian Kelly)

Innovation and best practices for the Web

  • Email Subscription (Feedburner)

  • Twitter

    Posts on this blog cover ideas often discussed on Twitter. Feel free to follow @briankelly.

    Brian Kelly on Twitter Counter

  • Syndicate This Page

    RSS Feed for this page

    Licence

    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. As described in a blog post this licence applies to textual content published by the author and (unless stated otherwise) guest bloggers. Also note that on 24 October 2011 the licence was changed from CC-BY-SA to CC-BY. Comments posted on this blog will also be deemed to have been published with this licence. Please note though, that images and other resources embedded in the blog may not be covered by this licence.

    Contact Details

    Brian's email address is ukwebfocus@gmail.com. You can also follow him on Twitter using the ID briankelly. Also note that the @ukwebfocus Twitter ID provides automated alerts of new blog posts.

  • Contact Details

    My LinkedIn profile provides details of my professional activities.

    View Brian Kelly's profile on LinkedIn

    Also see my about.me profile.

  • Top Posts & Pages

  • Privacy

    Cookies

    This blog is hosted by WordPress.com which uses Google Analytics (which makes use of 'cookie' technologies) to provide the blog owner with information on usage of this blog.

    Other Privacy Issues

    If you wish to make a comment on this blog you must provide an email address. This is required in order to minimise comment spamming. The email address will not be made public.

Risk Management Calculator For Open Content

Posted by Brian Kelly on 19 Jan 2011

Approaches to Risk Management in Innovation

In the past I have argued the need for a risk management approach to the exploitation of innovative services. This approach formed the basis of an invited talk I gave on “Library 2.0: Balancing the Risks and Benefits to Maximise the Dividends” at the Bridging Worlds 2008 conference held at the National Library of Singapore. The paper I presented was subsequently published in the Program journal: “Library 2.0: Balancing the Risks and Benefits to Maximise the Dividends“. Note that this paper is available in MS Word, PDF and HTML formats from the University of Bath repository.

The paper focussed primarily on the risks associated with use of Cloud services.  However there are associated legal, copyright and related risks which need to be considered.  Professor Charles Oppenheim contributed to a paper on “Empowering Users and Institutions: A Risks and Opportunities Framework for Exploiting the Social Web”  which built on this previous work and outlined a risk assessment and risk management approach for copyright risks. Again this paper is available in MS Word, PDF and HTML formats).

These papers argued the need for a risk-based approach and proposed a framework for understanding and documenting the risks, understanding the associated risks of doing nothing (e.g. missed opportunities), the associated costs and ways of minimising risks which have been identified.

This framework, which is intended to support the discussions and production of  documentation for development activities, acknowledges that there is a context to such decision-making, with organisations likely to have differing perspectives on risks: a government organisation is likely to be more risk-averse, for example, than an innovation company funded with venture capital. In addition different contexts of use  will require different approaches to risk assessment: whilst many users  will be willing to use a Social Web service to host photographs and videos, the same users may not wish to see their payroll system out-sourced in a similar fashion!

The JISC-Funded Risk Management Calculator

However our work did not provide a tool to support these processes. I was therefore pleased to receive an email today which announced a “New licensing tool for open content“. The announcement stated that

Licensing is complex and the more open you make content under an end user licence the greater the risk if you havent sought the necessary permissions. In partnership with the Higher Education Academy, JISC is funding a support project on IPR and licensing issues for Open Educational Resources. The latest addition to their suite of support resources is a new tool – the Risk Management Calculator  designed to help understand levels of risk associated with publishing open educational materials.   Typical examples of this might include materials which are still in copyright, but for which the rights holders cannot be traced or are unknown (so called Orphan Works).  The calculator helps those relatively new to licensing to make the right decisions when creating open content.

Naomi Korn, the project director for this work,  described how:

The Risk Management Calculator is a good example of the way the OER IPR support project team works: a marriage of copyright and licensing expertise with a group of immensely talented staff from the technology enhanced learning team at Plymouth University creating tools that users can use to help them understand and do copyright and licensing better.

The risk management calculator is available as a Web-based tool and an example of its used is illustrated below:

I think this is a valuable tool which should help to embed a risk management culture in development activities and move away from the simplicities of policy-based approaches  which can hinder innovation at a time in which rights issues can be complex and gaining permission can be costly and time-consuming, if  not impossible.

What are the risks, I wondered, if I wished to publish a video of a conference in which members of the audience may be identifiable?  It might be expensive and time-consuming to identify such people, track down contact details and seek permission. In such cases a risk management approach would appear appropriate. However using such a video and providing a Creative Commons licence for the resource will give a medium risk rating of between 180 and 450, although not assigning a Creative Commons licence would give a low risk of 90.

Now when I look to reuse photographs, for example, I check to see whether any identifiable individual might be embarrassed by the photo (are they picking their nose) – so there additional contextual issues which the calculator doesn’t address.  But seeking to include such factors in a tool would be likely to make the tool cumbersome to use as well as costly to develop.  So I welcome the release of this tool, whilst providing a suggestion that the decisions need to be taken by a human and not determined by the rating provided by this tool.

Note it is also worth making the point that the selection of a Creative Commons licence is likely, in many cases,  to be more risks than not assigning such a licence.  It would, I feel, be unfortunate if this tool acted as a barrier to greater use of Creative Commons.

2 Responses to “Risk Management Calculator For Open Content”

  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brian Kelly and Brian Kelly. Brian Kelly said: Risk Management Calculator For Open Content: Approaches to Risk Management in Innovation In the past I have argu… http://bit.ly/eZhNXr […]

  2. Naomi Korn said

    Hi Brian

    thanks very much for the positive feedback and for your worked example about how it might be used. We welcome other worked examples.

    You are absolutely right that any risk managed based decision should be made by humans and not machines, so our tool models decisions but does not make them for the user as well as hopefully making it clear that any use of our tool should be used as part of a broader risk managed approach.

    In answer to your query about the “No Licence” selected – this refers to the default position that a work will be “All Rights Reserved” unless stated so a selected CC licence will always be more permissive than this default position – hence the greater potential risk. Of course, the more open the licence – the greater the potential risk.

    Thanks again Brian and we are interested to hear how people will be using it.

    Naomi

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: